Directed By: Don Scardino (30 Rock)
Starring: Steve Carell, Steve Buscemi, Olivia Wilde, Jim Carrey, Alan Arkin
Rating: PG-13 for sexual content, dangerous stunts, a drug-related incident and language
Run Time: 1 hour, 40 minutes
Synopsis: Burt Wonderstone and Anton Marvelton (Carell and Buscemi) are two of the most famous magicians on the Las Vegas Strip. After 10 years though, their show has become stale and their friendship strained, and when an outlandish street magician named Steve Gray (Carrey) comes along to make things worse, it causes Anton to quit the show and Burt loses his job. Resorting to being an entertainer at a retirement home, Burt meets his childhood hero, an old magician named Rance Holloway (Arkin), who combines with Burt's former assistant Jane (Wilde) and inspires Burt to rediscover why he became a magician in the first place.
REVIEW
Andrew: Hello readers! Sarah and I are back from our hiatus
now that, for all intents and purposes, I’m finished with this past season of
college basketball and my schedule is about to open up. We apologize for the
lack of content recently but we can assure you that we’re back and we’ll be
coming out with our usual reviews and posts. We might even be able to start
cranking out more columns like our New Year’s Resolutions said we would.
All of that said, we kicked off our return by catching a
matinee showing of Steve Carell’s new comedy, The Incredible Burt Wonderstone.
Carell stars as a Las Vegas magician named Burt Wonderstone…
Sarah: And
Steve Buscemi (HBO’s Boardwalk Empire) plays his best
friend and partner Anton Marvelton, but their show is getting old and stale and
they’re in-fighting is tearing them apart.
Steve Carell and Steve Buscemi play off each other pretty well as "The Incredible Burt Wonderstone & Anton Marvelton," but this truly is Carell's movie for better and worse. |
A: And
then a street magician named Steve Grey, played by Jim Carrey (Kick-Ass 2), comes along and
essentially causes Burt and Anton to break up and lose their show.
So all of that said, we’re both pretty big fans of Carell’s,
from his hilarious and most famous characters of Michael Scott and Brick
Tamland, to his more dramatic acting chops in Crazy, Stupid, Love and Little
Miss Sunshine. Needless to say we were looking forward to seeing how
his new film is, and now that we’ve seen it, what did you think of it Sarah?
S:
Throughout the movie I was a little concerned that it was just going to be
another so-so funny movie…..and then the final act came around, which was just
fabulous to me. But honestly I didn’t really like most of it. I felt like the
pacing didn’t quite make sense and it just didn’t flow as nicely as it could
have.
But I loved the finish, and I think that sort of made up for
the rest of it. Because I love magic tricks, especially good ones, and while a
lot of it was movie magic it was still pretty cool. So yeah…..what did you
think of it?
A: I liked
it but didn’t love it. I agree with your sentiment that most of the movie is
uneven, both the pacing, the character development, the jokes were uneven…I
mean there are some really funny bits but for the most part either some of the
best stuff was given away in the trailer or it sort of falls flat.
But I agree with you that the final act is fun and it brings
things together, but it also drives home the point that the movie could have
been a lot better if it had been more like the final act.
S: Right.
Like if they had focused more on the magic and the elements of magic, the
development of Bruce and Anton’s magic tricks and things like that, it would’ve
been pretty cool.
A: The
thing to me, too, is that Carell’s Burt Wonderstone is a very uneven character.
We first see him as a 10-year-old child who’s mother gives him a magic kit for
his birthday and that’s where his love of magic blossoms from along with his
friend Anton. Then it jumps ahead to them being grown up as these young,
up-and-coming magicians who are just starting with their act and catching the
eye of a casino owner named Doug Munny, played by James Gandolfini (Zero
Dark Thirty), and then it jumps ahead ten years and Burt has become
this jaded and pompous ass and it just…
S: It
doesn’t make sense. They don’t explain to you why he’s like that…
A: Or
where the change came from…his voice is different from when he was younger…
S: It’s
like he’s trying to be suave…it just…what I think it was, was a writing issue.
I don’t think the writers knew who they wanted Burt to be. I think might have
been a bit of an acting or directing choice, too. And it didn’t work.
Know what else didn’t work for me? I hated Jim Carrey’s character.
A:
Really??
S: If
you’re going to have a villain that can do more impressive magic tricks than
the main character, make them actual magic tricks. Make it more like what David
Blaine and Criss Angel can actually do. And I get that it was like a satire on
what they do, but it was so unbelievable to me that I had a hard time with him.
A: I
didn’t have a problem with it because the film was taking it to an extreme to
make fun of magicians like Blaine and Angel. They’re trying to show you how
ridiculous those things are, and Carrey’s Steve Gray is doing these things like
sleeping on a hot bed of coals which is stupid, just like when David Blaine
stood in a block of ice for a few days.
I was okay with it, and I actually thought this was a nice
little return to form for Carrey as far as his playing an outlandish comedic
character. Again, some of his better parts were given away in the trailer or
the commercials for the movie, like when he’s holding his urine for a couple of
weeks and a reporter asks him what he’s thinking and he just responds with, “I
really have to pee, Richard,” in that classic Jim Carrey kind of way. So I
didn’t have a problem with it.
S: I don’t
know, maybe it’s because I’m not really a big fan of Carrey’s to begin
with. I think that his
over-the-top style of comedy isn’t that funny.
A: If
you’re not a fan of Jim Carrey then yeah, you’re probably not going to like him
in this movie. I, on the other hand…
S: You
love Jim Carrey.
A: I do,
and so I thought it was a nice return to form and I was happy to see that from
him.
S: It was a return to form, I’ll give him
that.
A: Real
quick, as it just popped in my head while were talking, I think the thing that
bugs me the most about Carell’s playing Burt Wonderstone as this pompous d-bag
is that once he’s fired he totally changes to more of a normal dude. He speaks
with a more normal voice and he becomes more a real person again, especially
after he gets a job as an entertainer at a retirement home and meets his
childhood hero, Rance Holloway…
S: Played
by the hilarious Alan Arkin (Argo).
A: That’s
when I think the movie really takes off, when Arkin comes in. I wish the movie
had been more of what it becomes once Burt is humbled and becomes more of a
normal guy. I understand why we had to see his relationship with Anton and
watch the act deteriorate…
S: But
watching Burt do their two-man show all by himself was unnecessary.
A:
Exactly. It was tough to watch. And here’s the other thing – I get that they
were trying to give Burt an arc and make him a redeeming character, but they
needed stick with one version of Burt or the other. Because there are scenes
like when Burt is crashing in an apartment and he puts the dinner plates
outside the front door like you would a hotel…
S: Which,
come on, it’s not like he’s lived in a hotel his whole life!
A: Right!
But then there are the scenes where he’s acting like a normal human being and
it just doesn’t make sense. You gotta make him silly the whole time or make him
relatively normal the whole time, I think. The unevenness of it was
disappointing to me.
S: True.
You know what I was a little disappointed with? I was disappointed in Steve
Buscemi’s…..
A: You
were disappointed with him??
S: No, not
with him. I was disappointed that he
was underutilized. I think if you’re going to use a name like Steve Buscemi in
a movie like this, give him more of a presence. And I know it’s Steve Carell’s
movie, but still…I was a little disappointed and I don’t think they used him to
his full capabilities.
A: I’d
agree with that. I thought one of the funnier bits in the movie was when Anton
goes to Cambodia on a mission. I thought Buscemi’s delivery was great on the
comedic bits and he even got me a little misty-eyed when he was reminiscing
with a reporter about when he and Burt were kids.
You know who I really want to talk about though, because in
my opinion the movie would have been strongest if it was actually about this
person? Olivia Wilde (People Like Us) as Burt and Anton’s magic assistant, Jane. I actually
think a movie like this would have been better served if it was focused on an
aspiring magician...
S: And I
wish we had seen more of her magic abilities! I wish that there had been more
magic overall.
A: I do,
too, because when we first see Anton and Burt’s magic show there are some
pretty cool things that we do, like The Hangman, and then obviously their big
trick in the film’s climax.
S: Which
was AWESOME.
A: So, you
know, I liked the film overall but I didn’t love it. I don’t think it’s one we’ll
own.
S: I don’t
think it’s in line with some of Carell’s better pieces at all.
A: It’s
really not. And the sad thing is you can see the moments when Carell’s true
talent shines through the other parts…
S: And
then it would disappear again and I was like, “Aww, well there it goes.”
A: Steve
Carell visited ESPN last week while we were in New York (curses!) and when he
went on one of our shows he talked about how this film is a silly comedy like Anchorman:
The Legend of Ron Burgandy…
S: I would
not compare this to Anchorman at all.
A: Me
neither. I understand why he made the comparison, because he was promoting the
film, but this is in no way as silly or as funny as Anchorman.
S: It had
its silly moments but it wasn’t funny silly. It was more groan inducing.
A: I don’t
even know if it was silly. The only silly moments I can think of would be like
when Rance does his final disappearing trick…
S: Which
is given away in the trailer.
A:
Exactly. So yeah, I don’t know…
S: It’s a
little bit of a bummer.
A: I’m
glad we saw it because we like Carell, but I don’t think it’s worth seeing in
theatres.
S: Me
neither.
FINAL VERDICT: Netflix it!
(Individual Scores - S: 2.5/5 A: 2.5/5) |
Photo Courtesies: FilmoFilia, clickondetroit.com, craveonline.com
Good review. Catch it if it's on TV, but that's about it. Not worth the watch or the wait.
ReplyDelete