Directed By: Sam Mendes (American Beauty)
Starring: Daniel Craig, Judi Dench, Javier
Bardem, Ralph Fiennes
Rating: PG-13 for intense violent sequences throughout, some sexuality, language and smoking
Run Time: 2 hours, 23 minutes
Synopsis: Following a mission gone wrong in
which critical information on undercover NATO agents is stolen and 007 (Craig) is
shot and presumed dead, M (Dench) and MI6 are brought under attack by a hacker
named Silva (Bardem) with a vendetta against M, and a bureaucrat (Fiennes)
looking to force M into retirement.
REVIEW
Andrew: Hello readers! Last week Sarah and I
were fortunate enough to catch a screening of the new James Bond movie Skyfall a full two weeks before its wide release. Skyfall stars Daniel Craig (The
Girl With The Dragon Tattoo) in his third turn as 007, Judi Dench (The
Best Exotic Marigold Hotel) in her 7th appearance as M, and
Javier Bardem (No Country For Old Men) as a villain named Silva who has a
personal vendetta out against M. We also get some new additions to the
franchise in Ralph Fiennes (Schindler’s List) as Gareth Mallory,
the Chairman of the Intelligence and Security Committee, who believes MI6 and
M’s ways to be antiquated, and Naomie Harris (Pirates of the Caribbean: At
World’s End) as a new MI6 agent named Eve.
I,
personally, have been REALLY looking forward to this film because the Bond
series is by far my favorite film series (as I’m sure it is for a lot of
people). I thought Casino Royale was breath of fresh air to the series and
possibly even the best of them all so far, which some traditionalists might
find blasphemous. Quantum of Solace was a bit of a letdown but I like it when you
put it back-to-back with Casino Royale…
Sarah: Yeah, it was definitely a follow-up
to Casino
Royale, it fit in quite nicely following up on the effects Vesper
Lynd’s death had on him. As a stand-alone film, it’s not that great.
But now you
have Skyfall.
Bond got his revenge for Vesper in Quantum of Solace so now we’re back
to more of a stand-alone Bond film. We’re back to BOND, as it were.
Bond is back, ladies and gents, and better than ever! |
A: Yeah, it’s far more of a stand-alone
film than the first two. In fact they kind of get away from the storyline the
first two sort of set up with the shadowy QUANTUM organization. But it’s for
the better.
S: Oh yeah. OH yeah. I was excited for
this one. I like the Bond movies for what they are but I haven’t seen all of
them so I’m not a die-hard Bond fan. I was disappointed with Quantum
of Solace. I felt it was a let-down and went very far away from who
James Bond is.
So I was a
little apprehensive about this one, I’m not going to lie. And even a little bit
into Skyfall
I remained apprehensive…
A: Why did it have you apprehensive?
S: Just…it wasn’t super action-packed…it
laid out a bit of a long storyline before introducing us to the bad guy…it just
seemed like it was going to go very techy and computery.
A: Wait, you mean you were apprehensive
WHILE the movie was still going on?
S: Yes!
A: Really?!
S: Yeah, pretty much for the first half.
It was good, don’t get me wrong. It was better than Quantum of Solace but I
didn’t think it was better than Casino Royale until the second half
kicked in.
A: Gotchya.
S: I was a little like, “Well this is
good, but it’s not blowing my mind like Casino Royale did.” It didn’t really
have the gadgets that Casino Royale did, it didn’t have
the suspense…I don’t know.
What I do
know is Skyfall literally flipped a switch halfway through and became a
whole new Bond film. I loved it! What did you think about it?
A: I’m different than you here, because
I loved it from the very beginning. The pre-opening credits scene – which the
Bond films have long been known for – had me hook, line and sinker right from
the very beginning.
There’s a
motorcycle chase through Istanbul that had me going pretty good. Bond had a few
good quips, there’s that kick-ass moment where Bond rips open the back of a
train and straightens his cuffs when he lands, plus the hand-to-hand fight on
top of said train was pretty darn good, too. That scene in and of itself
reminded me of Casino Royale in that you got to see Daniel Craig showcase HIS
version of Bond.
S: Good point - when he rips open the
back of the train? That was pretty Bond-esque.
A: So right from the get-go this movie
had me. And then while you weren’t enamored with the first half, I was because
not only did I think it was relatively action-packed but it looked. SO. GOOD.
The entire Shanghai sequence in Skyfall is gorgeously shot and amazing to look at. This photo doesn't do this particular scene justice. Trust us. |
This is a
BEAUTIFUL film, especially when things are taken to Shanghai. What
cinematographer Roger Deakins does with the neon lights and high-tech look of
Shanghai is fantastic. If Deakins isn’t nominated for an Oscar it’ll be a damn
shame.
S: Yeah, the scenes in China had
beautiful cinematography, but so did the rest of the film.
A: True. Even when the film moves to the
villain’s deserted island, which I loved by the way...I loved that the villain
had his own island. That’s such a Bond thing.
S: But even when the movie switches back
to England and Scotland everything looks amazing.
A: True. You get a real feel for
everywhere Bond has to go to in Skyfall. And because of that the
film really had me.
S: I kind of liked how…yes, it’s a James
Bond movie, but a lot of the focus is on Judi Dench’s M. I really felt like
they did a good job of shifting the focus towards her, because the bad guy
isn’t after Bond. Silva is after M. And I think that was a stroke of genius. It
switches things up from Bond being the target and it winds up being about Bond
trying to protect a woman he really cares about and respects. So I felt it was
pretty ingenious how they did that. Plus it doesn’t hurt that Dench was
fantastic. They gave her more to do in this film than any other Bond movie I’ve
seen and she was great.
I also loved
how Javier Bardem’s Silva was soooo slimy. You never know what’s up with him
and that’s creepy.
A: Bardem is fantastic as Silva. Right
from his introductory scene, which is a long, static take with him monologuing about
where he’s coming from, he’s phenomenal. He tells this story about growing up
on his grandmother’s island and how they dealt with a rat infestation that was
fascinating, he explains how his technological savvy and hacking skills make him
such a threat, but then he gets right up in Bond’s face and makes him really
uncomfortable. Like, he’s rubbing his legs and tracing the hairs on Bond’s
chest…it’s very homoerotic and there have been a lot of articles on the
Internet already about whether or not Silva is the Bond franchise’s first gay
villain, and they never really say whether he is or not. That’s what was so
great about his whole introductory scene.
S: Yeah, he IS but he isn’t homoerotic
in that scene. You never really can tell, can you?
A: He might be bisexual. Either way,
it’s a great scene and it works. Silva totally unnerves Bond, and really it’s
Bardem unnerving Craig. You can tell by the look on Craig’s face that he wasn’t
totally prepared for what Bardem was going to do.
S: Well it’s super creepy! It’s not
meant to be romantic, it was totally meant to unnerve Bond, absolutely. I think
that scene had one or two of us in the theatre squirming in our seats.
A: From what I could see it looked like
it had every guy in the theatre squirming a bit in their seat!
Here’s the
other thing about Bardem’s Silva: he’s a totally fleshed out character. You
find out exactly what his reasoning is, why he wants to get back at M, but he
also has a master plan that is VERY well thought out. When it all falls into
place you just go, “Damn!” Because the villain is smart, the script is smart,
the writers aren’t just throwing things up against the wall and seeing what
sticks. He’s a fully fleshed out villain and I loved that.
Javier Bardem's turn as Skyfall's villain, a cyber-terrorist named Raoul Silva, is one of the best in the history of the Bond series. |
S: I liked it too! The movie is good.
It’s really, REALLY good. The action sequences are epic, James Bond-esque
action sequences. They just show the strength of this version of James Bond
that Daniel Craig has brought to the screen. He’s not just this martini-sipping
gunslinger, he’s a full-on action character.
And I loved
what the other characters brought to this movie. It’s such an homage to the 50th
anniversary of the Bond series. It’s beautifully done and very subtle. It
brings you touches of the older, classic Bond films and really brings you full
circle.
A: The three Craig movies have come full
circle. The reboot in and of itself has been completed with Skyfall.
But yes, the little homages like a certain car that’s used at one point, the
use of John Barry’s original James Bond Theme, some sets they use in the course
of the film, and then of course the addition of Q.
S: Oh my gosh, I love the new Q!
A: I think the casting of Ben Whishaw (Cloud
Atlas) as the new Q is fantastic.
S: He was great! He’s perfect! I love
that he’s so modern. Because in the older Bond films isn’t Q and older
gentleman? Whishaw’s addition completely helps bring the new Bond movies into
the modern age. Bringing in a younger face to play a young, technological
genius as a foil and teammate for Bond is genius. Genius casting, it really is.
I also liked
Ralph Fiennes as Gareth Mallory. He can play such a slimeball that he was
perfect as a government agent who wants to bring about the end of M’s reign.
A: And I liked Naomie Harris as Eve. She
plays a big part in the opening action sequence and had some pretty good
chemistry with Bond out in the field, at least I thought so.
Overall I
can’t think of a single misstep this movie made. The only misstep I could even
possibly conceive of is when the film shifts in its final act. At the time it
felt a touch odd to me, and they added a new character you’ve never met before
to the series named Kincaide. And while you could have wondered why exactly
they needed to add him and have him played by such a big actor in Albert Finney,
in the end it doesn’t matter because I thought it worked.
S: I was thrown a little by the end, but
you actually learn a lot more about the character of James Bond in Skyfall
than you ever have before.
A: Very true. They’ve dropped hints
about Bond’s past before, like his parents and being an orphan, but they really
kind of bring the character home in Skyfall. They go deeper into his
past than ever before.
So again, a
lot of things they did well. I loved the music; I thought the score by Mendes
regular Thomas Newman was fantastic. I loved the takes on the classic James
Bond theme. Adele’s theme song was great…
S: Oh Adele’s song was fantastic. It fit
the opening credits so well. It was WAY better than Quantum of Solace’s.
A: But more important than those things?
Sam Mendes directed the hell out of this movie. He was a perfect choice. The
decision to give equal weight to the action scenes and the emotional scenes,
the shot choices he and Deakins made, the casting choices…just all around
Mendes rocked it.
I really
can’t complain about anything. From start to finish I was smiling. I’m really
glad about where they’ve taken the series. Again, the reboot is complete and
I’m excited to see where they take the Bond series from here.
S: Yeah, it’s going to be interesting to
see where they take it, like are they going to reboot some of the older,
classic villains? Will they bring back more homages to the older films or take
it off in its own direction with something fresh? Will Mendes come back? So
many questions and I think it brings tons of excitement to the series.
A: Absolutely. Do you have any negatives
about Skyfall?
S: Well like I said earlier I felt the
beginning was a bit slow, especially up until Silva is introduced.
A: What exactly did you find slow?
S: Well I thought the movie as a whole
was pretty talkative in the first half despite all the action scenes. Like
Silva’s introduction was a little long for me, too, right until the film
switches.
A: And where’s the switch?
S: Well I could tell you but it might
spoil the plot, babe.
A: Fair enough! I’ll agree with you that
parts of it are slow but I was totally fine with it because it balanced out so
well with the rest of the film.
S: Ok, so what’s our final verdict? You
want to give it five stars, don’t you?
A: Well, there are no flaws in it to me.
I think it’s the perfect James Bond movie, at least in conjunction with Casino
Royale. It’s light years better than Quantum of Solace,
and like you said it’s a great homage to the series as a whole. They couldn’t
have come up with a better Bond movie to come out on the film’s 50th
anniversary.
FINAL VERDICT: A must-see in theatres!
(Individual Scores - S: 5/5 A: 5/5) |
Photo Courtesies: Entertainment Weekly, Collider, NY Daily News, Movie Fanatic
Great review. I'm not a big Bond fan but I watched this because quite frankly, it seemed a better option than PA4 or Hotel Transylvania!
ReplyDeleteThis didn't feel like a conventional Bond film, which is good. It wasn't formulaic and we got to learn more about Bond, his human side. It also looked beautiful, like you guys point out.
I also liked some of the knowing winks it gave the dedicated fans. For example - Bond doesn't say 'shaken, not stirred' during the entire film. When he orders a drink, the waitress is shown shaking a cocktail and she puts it down, he says 'perfect' and drinks it. Subtle, sharp dialogue all the way through.
I actually want to watch it again!
Yes! Great call on the martini scene, we both thought the exact same thing and forgot to mention it in our discussion. But those are exactly the small winks and nods to the rest of the series that were so great about this one.
DeleteGlad you liked our review and the film! We'll definitely be seeing it again too when it comes out wide in America!
Great conversation, and I agree, this is a MUST see. I'm with Andrew, I never really found it slow at all. The beginning establishes the stakes, and then that scene in the casino in Macau I think, literally, is there to appease the old school Bond fans who wanted a bit more color and fanciful action... So, as one of those people, LOL, I was very happy with it. :D Bond vs Komodo Dragons!
ReplyDeleteThanks Dan! Skyfall certainly had it all. We have yet to hear one person say a negative thing about the movie and that's a testament to the four-quadrant execution and appeal by the filmmakers. We can't wait to see it again!
DeleteI loved the movie, too. I have to comment on one detail in the review that I really had a problem with and completely disagree with. You say Bardem unnerved Craig who wasn't prepared what Bardem would do. You cannot be serious. They all had read the script, and they talked about it a lot. You can bet Craig knew exactly what Bardem would do. Craig was not unnerved, he was acting to be because the character he was playing wasn't feeling comfortable. Craig is a brilliant actor and people he likes and respects (Mendes and Bardem in this case) would not only not need to use cheap tricks to get the desired effect, nor would they disrespect him by doing so. As for the characters, while uncomfortable, Bond is clearly not "totally unnerved" by it - obvious from his last line in the scene.
ReplyDeletePS. - To clarify what I meant by the last sentence: he's throwing the ball back at Silva, in a way winning that particular poker game. ;)
DeleteInteresting! It's absolutely possible that they all knew how the scene was going to be shot. That's just not how we interpreted that particular scene, and we love that a scene like that one can spur different interpretations from viewers!
DeleteIt wasn't our intent to imply that we thought Mendes would use cheap tricks to get a desired effect or response, but we were thinking more along the lines of that's how Bardem interpreted the script and how he chose to act the scene out.
Fair point though!
But you're still saying Craig wasn't acting. Tsk, tsk. Give him some credit, will ya? He's a professional. As are the others. So of course they discussed it to the last detail to make it as good as possible. This wasn't improvised theater. ;)
DeleteThey've all (Daniel, Javier, Sam) in fact said that a) they talked about it a lot, and b) they had a lot of fun shooting it, and I have no reason not to believe them... especially since it's what I would have assumed anyway.
Besides, there's nothing in that scene that should be of any reason for Craig the actual person to be nervous about, anyway. He - unlike Bond - was not at the mercy of a madman with a bunch of guys with guns a few meters away. :)
We're not trying to give short shrift to Craig. We simply were saying when we saw the movie that we interpreted the scene the way we did. Obviously Craig is still acting and did a fantastic job conveying what the whole crew was going for. We just took it as Bond being uncomfortable with Silva getting too touchy, but ultimately Bond is incredibly secure in his masculinity, so as you pointed out he ends up making no big deal.
DeleteWell, it sounded to me like you were since you were talking of Bardem unnerving Craig and Craig not being totally prepared, which like I said I totally disagree with. Sorry if I misunderstood you somehow. Bond and Silva... now that's a different thing, obviously. :)
Delete